1 response
Interesting. It would be nice to read more of his research to see what he's comparing today's youth to. It's true that we're putting all kids in a similar environment now—school. (And that's a stretch, because not all schools are "similar.") But I believe kids were also placed in a similar environment decades ago—the work force. And their communication and exposure was limited. They were surrounded by the people they grew up with and were navigating in a very familiar environment. Geography was the defining factor...no internet or phone at their disposal. So I'd be curious to see how he defines "being more prepared" and "mature."

It would also be interesting to see a comparison of "adult life" back then and "adult life" now. Perhaps we really are preparing our children to be as "prepared" and "mature" as they need to be to live the lives exemplified by most of the adults in their lives. So indeed their school is "real life." I know I don't live the same life my parents did; I certainly have it "easier."

Regardless, I think schools should be doing a better job. Reform is needed in the worst way. We should consider ourselves in crisis mode. Kids/students are definitely meeting our expectations. And it's those expectations that need to be revisited if we are looking to help children "grow" and "mature." We want them to be intellectually, physically and emotionally prepared for their independence...I don't know that the kids thrown into the workforce decades ago were any better prepared, but they definitely had fewer choices. Sink or swim! Somehow I think something in between these two scenarios would be best for all!

— J. Gallagher
Add Website URL »